{"id":3427,"date":"2020-10-19T09:50:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-19T08:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/?p=3427"},"modified":"2020-10-24T20:28:38","modified_gmt":"2020-10-24T19:28:38","slug":"uk-evangelicalism-three-streams-one-cross","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/uk-evangelicalism-three-streams-one-cross\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Evangelicalism: Three Streams, One Cross"},"content":{"rendered":"
It should be noted that this blog post had its origin in some comments on a minor factual issue in a chapter of a forthcoming book on the Atonement I’ve contributed to. With that in mind, it is probably not going to do what you want it to do, but I hope it will be of interest regardless. Caveat over…<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n The story goes like this. Back in 2006 the brave and plucky <\/span>Steve Chalke<\/a><\/span> wrote a book (with Alan Mann, <\/span>The Lost Message of<\/em><\/span> <\/span>Jesus<\/em><\/span>)which challenge the power of the cabal of conservative evangelicals who secretly control all Christianity in England. The truth as ever, is significantly less interesting. But there are some interesting things to observe in the debates about evangelical identity and what are (or are not) acceptable evangelical articulations of the atonement. I take as instructive and helpful for understanding evangelicalism (as I did in this <\/span>paper<\/a><\/span>) David Bebbington’s ‘quadrilateral’: evangelicalism is broadly focused on these four things:<\/span><\/p>\n Challenges to atonement go to the core of evangelical identity – not only a major theological thing but also a real and perceived felt thing for individuals. Indeed, after I wrote a blog post about the atonement years ago, someone in my church asked ‘God has saved me in Christ – who are you to tell me how?’. This is not an abstract truth claim or irrelevant debate – discussion of the atonement is intensely personal for evangelicals.<\/span><\/p>\n Now I noted the possibility of a secret cabal of conservative evangelicals – and in some parts of the church\/discussion of the church and theology it is common to assume (wrongly) that all<\/strong> evangelicals are by definition conservative.<\/p>\n This simply isn’t true.<\/p>\n In contrast to the common perception of American evangelicalism, or global evangelicalism (about the nuances of both of which this author is broadly ignorant), UK evangelicalism is a complex<\/strong> phenomenon. A particularly helpful article by the now retired Bishop Graham Kings can be found on Fulcrum’s website: Canal, River and Rapids: Contemporary Evangelicalism in the Church of England<\/a>. Obviously, evangelicalism in the UK is broader and bigger than that found in the Church of England, but it is not smaller or narrower, and so this classification system is particularly helpful. Indeed, the recent history of evangelicalism in the UK is arguably dominated by debates within Church of England evangelicalism (Because, of course, the C of E is not<\/strong> the only Anglican church in the UK, or even England!) – and those of us formally outside the C of E cannot simply ignore it<\/a>! Kings identifies three streams of evangelicalism. Using the metaphor of a watercourse, and the way that water flows, Kings examines particular hallmarks of three different forms of evangelicalism:<\/p>\n Committed to:<\/em><\/p>\n Open to:<\/em><\/p>\n Committed to:<\/em><\/p>\n Open to:<\/em><\/p>\n Committed to:<\/em><\/p>\n Open to:<\/em><\/p>\n There are obviously serious overlaps between these different strands – for example I would self identify as a conservative evangelical, who is egalitarian on female leadership and continuationist\/charismatic on the present day ‘spectacular’ gifts of the Spirit because of the authority of Scripture<\/strong><\/em>, whilst many of my friends would probably classify me as charismatic or open. I introduce this personal note because this is not just an abstract discussion – the debates on evangelical identity and atonement theories are not happening off in some idyllic theological college lounge (though they often do!) but in my mind, my marriage, my church, and the networks I’m part of. And it is these networks – colleges, publishers, mission organisations, ‘denominations’, and parachurch organisations – where evangelicalism is most articulated and discussed.<\/p>\n What is notable for my own present focus on the atonement (with reference to a 1995 SPCK publication that came out of a symposium on the atonement at St John’s Nottingham, whilst John Goldingay was Principal; to be contrasted with the 2007 IVP book co-authored by three theologians associated with Oak Hill College, or another book that emerged from a discussion hosted by the London School of Theology but initiated by the Evangelical Alliance) is that Kings observes that the \u201conly theological college currently specifically conservative, is Oak Hill in London<\/em>\u201d. To mis-label colleges (And by extension, networks, organisations etc) against their own self-identification is to engage in fake news. So when someone refers to ‘conservative evangelicals’, I want to read Kings Canal, River, Rapids<\/em> with them, taking into account the minimal changes since 2013, and ask them if they *really* mean ‘conservative’!<\/p>\n The interplay between the three streams is made more complex by the reality of individuals serving as \u2018navigators\u2019, as Kings summarises:<\/p>\n \u201cIn concluding this section of outlines, it may be helpful to mention three significant evangelical Anglican leaders and prolific authors who, like many, navigate more than one watercourse, thus showing again the importance of the fluidity of the metaphor. John Stott is the architect of the postwar renaissance in evangelical Anglicanism. He may be seen as an example of someone who navigates the canal and the river: a conservative evangelical who in the 1970s realized increasingly the importance of the issues of social, political and ecumenical involvement. Michael Green, an evangelist and theologian, was greatly influenced by David Watson and may be seen as an example of someone who navigates the river and the rapids: an open evangelical who saw God’s vitality in the contemporary use of the gifts of the Spirit. Alister McGrath, a key focal theologian of the evangelical movement, may also be seen as someone who navigates both the canal and the river: increasingly open to women’s issues, his current major publishing project is on the interplay between science and theology and he has publicly welcomed the appointment of Rowan Williams, while still disagreeing with him on the issue of homosexuality.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n The aforementioned 2007 IVP book, regardless of your own opinion on it, represents a form of this ‘navigating’, not least in terms of who endorsed it at the time, thus suggesting it might have value! Looking back at this book from 13 years ago reveals a depressingly white and male evangelical intelligentsia, and some names give a pause for sober reflection as to where they are now in terms of recent news and trajectories. Names who would in 2007 and today resist the characterisation of \u2018conservative evangelical\u2019 include C.J.Mahaney (charismatic!), Tremper Longman III, I. Howard Marshall, Mike Pilavachi, Mark Stibbe (charismatic) and Terry Virgo (con-evo, to be sure, but very deliberately and publicly charismatic\/apostolic). Other figures whose relationship with mainstream conservative evangelicalism is either strained or complex would include Carl Trueman (rejects the label and is critical of both UK and US evangelicalism), Gordon Wenham and Michael Ramsden.<\/p>\n So, to sum up: what should all this make us ponder?<\/p>\n Again, if you’ve read this far, you might want to read a little further. Here are a few reviews of books by people that I wonder if they might be possible future navigators…<\/p>\n Oh, and if you want to read about atonement, here are three books you should have on your desk…<\/p>\n It should be noted that this blog post had its origin in some comments on a minor factual issue in a chapter of a forthcoming book on the Atonement I’ve contributed to. With that in mind, it is probably not … Continued<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3429,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"kt_blocks_editor_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[26,392,88,661,105,453,55,17],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3427"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3427"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3427\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3441,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3427\/revisions\/3441"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thomascreedy.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
Canal: Conservative Evangelicals<\/h4>\n
\n
\n
River: Open Evangelicals<\/h4>\n
\n
\n
Rapids: Charismatic Evangelicals<\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n